<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Milton - EdTribune VT - Vermont Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Milton. Data-driven education journalism for Vermont. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://vt.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Champlain Valley Cut Its Chronic Absenteeism Rate in Half — to Under 10%</title><link>https://vt.edtribune.com/vt/2026-04-16-vt-champlain-valley-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://vt.edtribune.com/vt/2026-04-16-vt-champlain-valley-success/</guid><description>In a state where one in four students is chronically absent, Champlain Valley SD has driven its rate to under one in ten. The state&apos;s largest district — 4,150 students spread across Hinesburg, Charlot...</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In a state where one in four students is chronically absent, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/vt/districts/champlain-valley-sd&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Champlain Valley SD&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has driven its rate to under one in ten. The state&apos;s largest district — 4,150 students spread across Hinesburg, Charlotte, Shelburne, St. George, and Williston — recorded a 9.9% chronic absenteeism rate in 2023-24. Two years earlier, it was 21.3%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That kind of reduction does not happen by accident. It does not happen because of demographics alone. And it raises a question that matters for every district in Vermont performing worse: what did Champlain Valley do?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The numbers&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/vt/img/2026-04-16-vt-champlain-valley-success-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Champlain Valley&apos;s trajectory compared to the state average&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Champlain Valley&apos;s chronic rate in 2021-22 was 21.3% — close to the state average at the time. That meant 897 students missing at least 10% of school days. By 2022-23, the number dropped to 557 (13.2%). By 2023-24, it fell to 410 (9.9%). The district shed 487 students from its chronically absent count in two years, a 54% reduction, while its total enrollment barely changed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 9.9% rate puts Champlain Valley 14.4 percentage points below the state average and nearly six times below &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/vt/districts/rutland-city-sd&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Rutland City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s 56.7%. It is the lowest rate of any district in Vermont.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/vt/img/2026-04-16-vt-champlain-valley-success-peers.png&quot; alt=&quot;Champlain Valley compared to other large districts&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among districts with 1,500 or more students, the next-closest rate belongs to &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/vt/districts/essex-westford-sd&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Essex Westford SD&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 11.7%. After that, the jump is steep: &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/vt/districts/colchester-sd&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Colchester&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 18.1%, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/vt/districts/milton-sd&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Milton&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 20.2%, and most others above 25%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What the district did differently&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CVSD&apos;s approach centered on something most districts do not systematically measure: whether students feel they belong. The district conducts &lt;a href=&quot;https://vtdigger.org/2026/01/29/vermont-schools-are-making-headway-to-address-chronic-absenteeism-but-rates-remain-stubbornly-high/&quot;&gt;student engagement surveys three times a year&lt;/a&gt;, tracking not just academic metrics but whether students feel their ideas are valued, whether they feel connected to adults in the building, and whether they see school as worth attending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data from those surveys produced a finding that guided the district&apos;s intervention strategy: students who feel their ideas are valued are chronically absent at half the rate of students who feel overlooked. That correlation does not prove causation — students with more stable home lives may both attend more regularly and report higher engagement. But it gave the district a lever to pull that was within its control.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rather than focusing exclusively on the mechanics of attendance — phone calls, home visits, truancy proceedings — CVSD invested in the conditions that make attendance feel worthwhile. The engagement-first model treats chronic absenteeism as a symptom rather than a cause.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Context and caveats&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/vt/img/2026-04-16-vt-champlain-valley-success-improvement.png&quot; alt=&quot;Two-year improvement rankings for all districts&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Champlain Valley&apos;s 11.4 percentage-point improvement ranks among the top performers in the state, though several smaller districts achieved larger drops. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/vt/districts/kingdom-east-sd&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Kingdom East SD&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; dropped 28.1 points, White River Valley fell 25.5, and Springfield cut 22.3 points. The difference is where they started: those districts came down from rates above 45%. Champlain Valley started below the state average and still cut its rate in half.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Geography matters. Champlain Valley sits in Chittenden County, Vermont&apos;s economic engine, with Burlington&apos;s labor market and the University of Vermont nearby. The district&apos;s families tend to have higher incomes and more stable employment than districts in the Rutland region or the Northeast Kingdom. An honest accounting of CVSD&apos;s success has to acknowledge that some portion of the improvement reflects community advantages that other districts cannot replicate through policy alone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/vt/img/2026-04-16-vt-champlain-valley-success-counts.png&quot; alt=&quot;Champlain Valley: chronically absent versus not, by year&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the timeline matters too. CVSD&apos;s rate was 21.3% in 2022 — not vastly different from the state average. Whatever advantages the community provides, they did not prevent the COVID-era spike. The recovery required deliberate action. The question for other districts is not whether they can match CVSD&apos;s 9.9% — that may not be realistic everywhere — but whether the engagement-focused model works at all outside affluent suburban settings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>